Welcome, Guest
You have to register before you can post on our site.

Username
  

Password
  





Search Forums

(Advanced Search)

Forum Statistics
» Members: 67
» Latest member: adi998
» Forum threads: 660
» Forum posts: 673

Full Statistics

Online Users
There are currently 34 online users.
» 0 Member(s) | 33 Guest(s)
Bing

Latest Threads
Issue with Gateway Autopl...
Forum: Past or Current cases
Last Post: kishana.n
11-23-2022, 05:17 PM
» Replies: 0
» Views: 15
Small claims case in Sant...
Forum: Past or Current cases
Last Post: kishana.n
11-22-2022, 09:16 PM
» Replies: 0
» Views: 21
Issue with Amazon
Forum: Past or Current cases
Last Post: kishana.n
11-21-2022, 04:11 PM
» Replies: 0
» Views: 28
Bristol West Insurance Gr...
Forum: Past or Current cases
Last Post: kishana.n
11-18-2022, 07:27 PM
» Replies: 0
» Views: 28
Federal court jurisdictio...
Forum: Arbitration information
Last Post: Donesia
11-18-2022, 02:29 PM
» Replies: 0
» Views: 40
Lawsuit in Ukraine
Forum: Past or Current cases
Last Post: kishana.n
11-17-2022, 04:50 PM
» Replies: 0
» Views: 27
Amazon and Macys
Forum: Past or Current cases
Last Post: kishana.n
11-17-2022, 01:21 PM
» Replies: 0
» Views: 27
T-Mobile settlement
Forum: Arbitration questions
Last Post: kishana.n
11-16-2022, 09:14 PM
» Replies: 0
» Views: 49
Dispute with Chime Financ...
Forum: Past or Current cases
Last Post: kishana.n
11-15-2022, 08:56 PM
» Replies: 0
» Views: 28
Issue with PayPal
Forum: Past or Current cases
Last Post: Donesia
11-14-2022, 02:09 PM
» Replies: 0
» Views: 37

 
  Issue with Gateway Autoplex
Posted by: kishana.n - 11-23-2022, 05:17 PM - Forum: Past or Current cases - No Replies

Here is a previous case by *** (Identity withheld for privacy reasons).

My daughter purchased a car from Gateway Autoplex in Saint Charles Missouri. They sold her this car without it having past emissions around August 18. They have had custody of this car at their shop or another mechanic shop since September 1 and the car still has not passed emissions and they are refusing to refund us or replace the car and every time we call they either say the car will be finished today or they don’t answer and they don’t return calls. Is there any way she can be helped? She paid $7350 and also was forced to pay $1000 for a new engine. They guarantee that it would pass inspection if she paid that, that was over a month ago. I would like to add they did provide a three-month warranty on this car so it was not an as-is sale as they are claiming there is no As is paperwork in her file. My daughter is a student and she is also hearing impaired so I am trying to help her out.

Print this item

  Small claims case in Santa Clara County
Posted by: kishana.n - 11-22-2022, 09:16 PM - Forum: Past or Current cases - No Replies

Here is a previous case by *** (Identity withheld for privacy reasons).

We were dealing with a small claims COVID rental release case in Santa Clara County, and I just received judgments from the judge in the mail stamped on the 15th of November, but it was created on the 10th of November. I currently reside and have resided in San Diego County where the property is. I am having this issue with the owner of the property. We resided at the property for 3 years. I need to get some more information on how we can put in an appeal and how we can get the logistics regarding us not receiving our security deposits and the judge didn’t get any of that information nor took any of that into consideration and putting a small claims judgment for an individual over almost $8000. Again, this is regarding heading an appeal for a small claims matter that is in Santa Clara County, but we don’t currently reside there. We lived there on a job transfer and moved back to San Diego after our entire U-Haul was stolen and we needed to get back to a safe spot, but the judge was not willing to listen to any of our concerns and made the judgment of the $8000 to be paid to the owner of the property for an individual in a small claims matter. We also didn't receive our $36,000 security deposit that was paid to her. The name of the judge is EJ and we went to the Santa Clara County Superior Court. They also didn’t submit the COVID release form to get the funds for the state of emergency that was in place back in 2020. This was submitted in the COVID amendment release that was signed and dated April 5th, 2020, and we didn’t get those funds. This appeal needs to be filed quickly and I am driving down to the court to get more details on how small claims work. I need communication from a lawyer on how to submit the appeal for the judgment as the property is in Santa Clara County and we reside in San Diego.

Print this item

  Issue with Amazon
Posted by: kishana.n - 11-21-2022, 04:11 PM - Forum: Past or Current cases - No Replies

Here is a previous case by *** (Identity withheld for privacy reasons).

Sir, I purchased a Oneplus mobile from Amazon on 13.11.22, from last one day I will continue to follow up with Amazon for return. I received a defective piece of mobile camera quality, very bad and automatically switch off and on within 2-3 hrs., but they did not return my product till now, harasses me, and today is last day for return 21.11.22. I want the case file against Amazon.

Print this item

  Bristol West Insurance Group
Posted by: kishana.n - 11-18-2022, 07:27 PM - Forum: Past or Current cases - No Replies

Here is a previous case by *** (Identity withheld for privacy reasons).

I am looking for help with my insurance company Bristol West, which is a part of the Farmers Insurance Group. They had closed a claim and didn't let me know that it was reopened. They initially told me that it wasn't my fault then they changed it to my fault and I didn't know. I thought the case was closed and now when I had to renew my insurance it was really high. I have my own insurance, but my daughter had an accident and the other person involved put a claim on my policy. The final decision made was that it was nobody's fault and we both had to pay for our damages from our pocket. The last thing I heard was that the case was closed and this happened on May 21, 2022. I called my insurance company and they said the accident was my fault. They didn’t tell me the case was reopened and that the decision had changed. I have a right to know as I am paying my insurance and they didn’t tell me anything about it. I had just renewed my policy in October and I don't know why they didn’t tell me about the accident, and that the case was reopened, and give me the chance to fight back.

Print this item

  Federal court jurisdiction issues--plaintiff's filing stricken
Posted by: Donesia - 11-18-2022, 02:29 PM - Forum: Arbitration information - No Replies

November 2022


Full docket text for document 9:
MINUTE entry before the Honorable Steven C. Seeger: Plaintiff Progressive Express Insurance Co. recently filed an amended complaint. It asks the Court for a declaratory judgment under 28 U.S.C. § 2201, declaring that it doesn't owe the Defendants any money for insurance claims stemming from a car crash on I-90. See Am. Cplt., at ¶ 1 (Dckt. No. [8]). Plaintiff acknowledges that it sold an auto-insurance policy to Defendant Harry's Truck Service, but claims that this policy doesn't apply to the crash for a variety of reasons. Id. at ¶ ¶ 38, 42, 46, 52. Plaintiff says that this Court has both federal-question and diversity jurisdiction. Id. at ¶ 2. This Court will put to one side (for the moment) the question of federal question jurisdiction, which seems dubious (at first blush, anyway) under Grable & Sons Metal Products, Inc. v. Darue Engineering & Manufacturing, 545 U.S. 308 (2005). If that's right, diversity jurisdiction is the only remaining jurisdictional hook, and diversity jurisdiction requires complete diversity. Plaintiff alleges that it is a citizen of Ohio. See Am. Cplt., at ¶ 8 (Dckt. No. [8]). But the citizenship of the Defendants is hazy. The list of Defendants includes an LLC, an LP, a company, a corporation, and a bunch of natural persons. For jurisdictional purposes, they stand on different footings. A corporation is a citizen where it is incorporated and where it has its principal place of business. Not so for an LLC and an LP. A limited liability company is a citizen wherever its members are citizens. It makes no difference where a limited liability company is registered, or where it has its principal place of business. For an LLC, the citizenship of its members is all that matters. See Belleville Catering Co. v. Champaign Mkt. Place, LLC, 350 F.3d 691, 692 (7th Cir. 2003); Martin v. Living Essentials, LLC, 653 Fed. Appx. 482, 485 (7th Cir. 2016) ("[T]he home 'base' of a limited liability company, or LLC, is irrelevant, given that an LLC has the citizenship of each of its members."); Thomas v. Guardmark, LLC, 487 F.3d 531, 534 (7th Cir. 2007) ("For diversity jurisdictional purposes, the citizenship of an LLC is the citizenship of each of its members."); Cosgrove v. Bartolotta, 150 F.3d 729, 731 (7th Cir. 1998) ("[T]he citizenship of an LLC for purposes of the diversity jurisdiction is the citizenship of its members."); Fellowes, Inc. v. Changzhou Xinrui Fellowes Office Equip. Co., 759 F.3d 787, 787-88 (7th Cir. 2014). A limited partnership has the citizenship of its partners, too. For individuals, what matters is where a person is domiciled (i.e., residence plus intent to remain), not where a person is living. See RTP LLC v. ORIX Real Estate Capital, Inc., 827 F.3d 689, 692 (7th Cir. 2016) ("Citizenship depends not on residence but on domicile, which means the place where a person intends to live in the long run. It is possible to reside in one state while planning to return to a long-term residence in another state."). The amended complaint does not include adequate jurisdictional allegations, by a long shot. For example, the complaint brings a claim against an LLC, adding that its principal place of business is Florida, but its principal place of business makes no difference. Id. at ¶ 4. Plaintiff also sues a limited partnership and says that its principal place of business is Pennsylvania, even though it does not matter. Id. at ¶ 6. And it lists the residency, but not the citizenship, of the individual Defendants. Id. at ¶ ¶ 711, 1317. In sum, the jurisdictional allegations of the amended complaint are inadequate, so the amended complaint (Dckt. No. [8]) is hereby stricken. The Court grants Plaintiff leave to file a second amended complaint with proper jurisdictional allegations by November 21, 2022. Mailed notice. (jjr, )

Print this item

  Lawsuit in Ukraine
Posted by: kishana.n - 11-17-2022, 04:50 PM - Forum: Past or Current cases - No Replies

Here is a previous case by *** (Identity withheld for privacy reasons).

Need an attorney to sue a party in Ukraine for personal and property damage.

Print this item

  Amazon and Macys
Posted by: kishana.n - 11-17-2022, 01:21 PM - Forum: Past or Current cases - No Replies

Here is a previous case by *** (Identity withheld for privacy reasons).

Is doing a chargeback and refusing me by all means, and racially discriminating against me.

Print this item

  T-Mobile settlement
Posted by: kishana.n - 11-16-2022, 09:14 PM - Forum: Arbitration questions - No Replies

Here is a previous question that was asked by *** (Identity withheld for privacy reasons).

Responding to T-Mobile settlement. What is required?

I am responding to a postcard indicating legal settlement as claimant to proceeds. I received this postcard from Kroll settlement administrationllc New York. I received it on 11/14/2022. I've done business with T-Mobile before but had no issues. Just received postcard about the T-Mobile settlement and would like to know more.

Print this item

  Dispute with Chime Financial
Posted by: kishana.n - 11-15-2022, 08:56 PM - Forum: Past or Current cases - No Replies

Here is a previous case by *** (Identity withheld for privacy reasons).

I was going to use Fairshake for this process but I want to use someone else as a representative with limited scope in regards to my dispute with Chime banking. I did it all by myself last time and I won the awards within the ADR but I think I'll need help with this one. Of course against a different corporation. On 3-7-2022 I did a "pay anyone" promotion that had a chance to win your money you would send to an individual directly back; so with that being visually available to me upon the app; I paid a contact previously by the name of KM in the amount of $100.00USD and everything was fine. On the date listed above, I chose to pay another friend that didn't have Chime; and he never received the money in the amount of $66.00USD I double-checked the app and it was sent to a person by the name of a FS. So my friend and I made sure everything was correct on my end and his phone number was that of the one I had entered in to send him the money; I have disputed this 3 times with 2 rebuttals seeing how as the first "investigation" took less than a few hours to complete! So the person that was rightfully supposed to receive the money payment provides chime with his phone number and documents of his state issued ID and also his Mobile Bill to prove that he was the owner of the number that I put in to send him the 66$ and he never got a response and he is now denied even having chime because the wrong person has chime using his phone number.

It's a mess all around and they refuse to refund me my money; but it's not all about the money this has been going on for almost a year and no resolution or anything positive at all. I've had over 5000$ deposited into that account and never had a problem until this incident when I was screamed at and harrassed and mocked. I used to use chime just as a bank for needed services but I'll never use them again because they have called me a liar and much more. And 66.00$ may not mean a lot to me but my loyalty meant nothing to them. A family that is hungry could have been a horrible situation for them. The standards and codes they have in play for their employees is sub par and I pray no one else has to go through what I'm still going through. If u need clarification of any subject I will provide.

Print this item

  Issue with PayPal
Posted by: Donesia - 11-14-2022, 02:09 PM - Forum: Past or Current cases - No Replies

Here is a previous case by *** (Identity withheld for privacy reasons).

PayPal Dispute 

Payment sent to EC-ANGEL ONLINE SHOP scam website selling fake anabolic steroid and erectile dysfunction pills
January 25, 2022, at 12:09:58 PM

Already tried to dispute the order but they said can't give a refund of 125 dollars and I got personal injury from these fake pills like rash underarms like shingles and a black Skin Abscess with puss leaving a scar because it was infected and a red stretch mark because of itchy rash. I want to sue for emotional distress too and I wanted to sue PayPal for professional liability for having vendors selling counterfeits drugs from overseas and privacy violation because I keep getting scam invoice saying I bought wrapped bitcoin from Coinbase with PayPal for $449 dollars and that same amount I recently won settlement to Coinbase for account frozen. I feel like PayPal employee are hacking in and looking at my emails. Try to sue as much as you can please.

Print this item

About US Arbitration Corp.

Focus MyBB Theme is designed for MyBB 1.8 series and is tested properly till the most current version of MyBB i.e. 1.8.x. It is simple, clean and light MyBB theme with use of font-awesome icons and shrinking header.

Modify above message at Admin CP -> Templates and Styles -> Focus Templates -> Footer Template - footer

              Quick Links

              User Links