Welcome, Guest |
You have to register before you can post on our site.
|
Online Users |
There are currently 36 online users. » 0 Member(s) | 36 Guest(s)
|
|
|
Doordash |
Posted by: kishana.n - 2 hours ago - Forum: Past or Current cases
- No Replies
|
 |
Here is a previous case by *** (Identity withheld for privacy reasons).
Hi, I got deactivated recently from Doordash and I'm 100% sure I did nothing wrong and I would like to see if I have a case here as they won't tell me the exact reason why I was deactivated.
|
|
|
Unpaid personal loan in Qatar for 5 years |
Posted by: kishana.n - Yesterday, 01:20 PM - Forum: Arbitration questions
- No Replies
|
 |
Here is a previous question that was asked by *** (Identity withheld for privacy reasons).
I got terminated and unable to pay my loan for the last 5 years. Because of these, I got behind bars for 4 months but still, I didn't pay my personal bank loan and currently, I have a travel ban. I want to go home. What shall I do?
|
|
|
Unpaid loan in Dubai |
Posted by: kishana.n - Yesterday, 01:12 PM - Forum: Past or Current cases
- No Replies
|
 |
Here is a previous case by *** (Identity withheld for privacy reasons).
Good Day! I have unpaid loan at Dubai, UAE since 2020 I lost my job because of Pandemic that time I need to go back to my home country they not allowed me to go outside because I'm pregnant. Now I have a offer letter in Qatar, but I'm scared to travel, they can check my record in UAE. I call and send email to the bank, that soon if I have stable job I will pay my loan. The amount of my loan is 45,000 aed.
|
|
|
Property issue with California Department of Veterans Affairs |
Posted by: Donesia - 03-24-2023, 09:27 PM - Forum: Past or Current cases
- No Replies
|
 |
Here is a previous case by *** (Identity withheld for privacy reasons).
The client called and said her husband submitted his name and phone number on a website to get some help with an issue they were having, and someone called them a couple of weeks ago, and said they would have called back but never did. She said that her husband spoke to a man but didn't go into many details, but explained that this was about a clouded title and them getting back their property in their names. She said she wanted to see if they qualified for contingency. She said they have a large case involving state agencies, corruption, and fraud. Their property was swindled from them by the California Department of Veterans Affairs (CalVet) with the help of First American. She said First American gave title insurance to veterans for loans. She said the California Department of Veterans Affairs said they had a title, mortgage, and insurance, but they never had those things. They learned that it was recorded as a fake mortgage and escrow number, and that's how they stole the property. She said they were making payments the whole time on a fake mortgage. But the judge didn't care, so he gave CalVet a writ of possession. She said they had the house since 1989 and were kicked out. In 2017, they had to move in with their younger son and girlfriend. They sold the house for 500K, but their original loan was 130K. She said their mortgage was never good with CalVet, and their house foundation never passed. She said Colorado courts asked for documents, but they gave fake documents. She said a lot of corruption is happening in the California courts. She said they are senior citizens and her husband, a veteran. They said on paper that they gave first preference to veterans, but they don't. She said it was a 5-acre property, and they cleared the land, put a septic in, and did a lot of work on the property.
She said they were paying the mortgage every month through Schools Credit Union for different amounts, sometimes $400, $700, etc. She said the loan was never closed, but they got the principal knocked out. The judge was told that they never paid despite their bank statements showing that they did. The deed was still in CalVet's name because a part of the loan agreement was for them to sign it over to them, and once the loan was paid off, they would have gotten the deed. She said they would have never been able to pay off the loan because it was not a real loan. As soon as they made the loan, the house was in foreclosure, but they never did foreclosure. Instead, a writ possession was done to get the property back. She said the judge was later kicked out, and the lawyer on the case was disbarred.
She said one of the lawyers took $23500 to proceed with the case. The lawyer wanted them to make another contract with CalVet and continued paying them. She said the judge said it was a frivolous case, and he didn't want to know the specifics. So she was not sure why the lawyer took so much. She said the case is ongoing. Her husband has been getting a continuance, but he doesn't have an attorney. He has done research online and found things. She said he has some papers due at the end of April. She said they made a complaint to the Engineer Board about the engineer that did their foundation plans that were never passed, and the Engineer Board took their complaint to the Attorney General. She said the Attorney General represents the California Department of Affairs (CalVet) as they represent state agencies. However, CalVet has its attorneys, which she thinks is against the law. She thinks it's ridiculous the amount they paid in lawyer fees, and they didn't get their property back. The lawyer advised them to file bankruptcy instead of suing CalVet, and in turn, allowed them to get the property. The bankruptcy plan said they had a mortgage, which they were told to keep paying if they didn't want to be in trouble with the judge. But they were paying the attorneys, CalVet, and a trustee. She said the bankruptcy plan failed because, at the end of it, they couldn't sell the property as the title was clouded. She said over $4000 was also left in escrow which they never received. She said unfortunately the money was put in bankruptcy and went to the lawyer.
|
|
|
Help with restraining order |
Posted by: kishana.n - 03-14-2023, 07:51 PM - Forum: Past or Current cases
- No Replies
|
 |
Here is a previous case by *** (Identity withheld for privacy reasons).
The client said she needed representation for a restraining order. She said it was against her ex-boyfriend, VT. She said he was a senior. She said she dated him for about a year and a half. She said the first year she would see him mostly on Saturdays because she was working two jobs in the first part. She said in the last 9 months she received a state of Illinois rental assistance and he helped her to find a property. She said it was right behind his old property where he lived and grew up. She said she met him in high school and they weren't friends, but they shared some mutual friends. She said he spent several years in jail and was released in October 2019. She said he reached out to a mutual friend and demanded her phone number. She said they were afraid of him and have him her number. She said when he got her number he said he wanted to get a hair cut and he reached out, but she took several weeks to respond. She said he was a bully in high school and she only went to the same school for 1 year then she transferred. She said she never saw or heard from him until 30 years later he contacted her. She said she is a licensed barber and cut his and his mother's hair before she passed away.
She said throughout the relationship she found out he had a colorful past and committed a couple of murders and went to jail for them. She said when his mom passed away she was notified that she can move and was approved. She said they now shared the same alley that he grew up in as his house was 4 houses down. She said he has young children, 5 and 8 years old. She said she moved to the house in June and he dropped his kids at her house. She said they spent 33 days at her house. She said after about 2 weeks she went down to where he lived, but he was sick and sitting in the dark. She said he was on prescription drugs maybe 10-15 medicines for medical issues. She said she told him that they should go for a ride, and went and met in an accident. She said when she went to the hospital for check-ups the nurse asked whose kids they were and she told them they were his kids. She said when they got released she told him school will be starting, so it was time to take the kids home as they lived about 2 hours away. She said he never came with her and she took them home. She said through the whole car ride he was texting her saying that it was his children and she has no right to take them home and she should bring his kids back and use expletives. She said she dropped the kids off and returned and told him she can’t deal with a person who wants her to be responsible for his kids and he was not there. She said she has two children also, at the time they were 18 and 13 years old.
She said VT convinced her to help him start a lawn mower service. She said she got a truck in her name. She said during the fall when the kids had left after the season was over she realized she was working harder than him and she asked for money, but he didn’t want to pay her. He said the money wasn’t clear and she told him that the next season she wouldn't help him, he was on his own. She said she then told him it was not working for her and the relationship. She said she was not sure how sick he was, and he told her that he was working through the problem and he went to a place that she thought was helping. She said she then found out it was a methadone place. She said he stored some equipment at her house, so he asked for a key to the basement and she said it was okay. She said he wasn’t the person she thought he was and when they got money from the settlement they would go separate ways. He said she told her that she should be helping him to raise the kids. She said she told him she doesn’t have time and patience and she gave him names of places that could help tutor his kids. She said she told him the relationship can’t work if she can’t do things. She said she can't have him around her kids while he was sick. She said her kids are now 21 and 15.
She said he was approved for SSI and she became his payee, but in September 2022 she took her name off and he started becoming aggressive. She said they owed a mortgage and the bank took the house after his mother died. She said he moved to a mobile in Caromont City. She said after he moved they were still having intimate relations, but she was trying to pull away from him and started to threaten his kids. She said her son had a baby at 20 and in October 2022 he was saying things like the baby isn't for her son and the gang members were going to hurt him. She said she didn’t feed into it was just listening. She said she was working at night as she works at the school in the day and the barber shop at night. She said he was at the door one night to her teenage daughter. She said she called him and told him that he shouldn't show up at her house wanting to talk to her daughter. She said she told him not to show up when she was not there. She said in October a gentleman stayed directly behind their house and in 2021 he pulled a gun out on him. She said VT grabbed his BBQ grill and brought it to her house after in her backyard. She said she pulled it back down the street and it was heavy. She said in December she wasn’t speaking to him. She said she was a barber instructor up the street, and she went there on Saturdays and VT came there and followed her outside. She said she left and told them he was threatening her and her kids and she’s not coming back if he is there. She said VT went there the following Saturday and he wanted her to cut his kid's hair. She said she called the school again and let them know she doesn't know if she can work if he keeps coming back. She said they wrote a letter that he’s not allowed to be there on the days she works. She said she knows his intentions aren’t good, and she doesn’t want him around her or her children, she’s scared of him. She said when she filled out the restraining order it wasn’t filled out right as she said she didn't need a lawyer. She said she wants somebody else to talk on behalf of her. She said after this she know she will have to move out of the area.
|
|
|
The European Consumer Centre |
Posted by: Donesia - 03-10-2023, 01:03 PM - Forum: Arbitration information
- No Replies
|
 |
The European Consumer Centre (ECC) can help consumers in several ways:
Information and advice: The ECC provides free information and advice to consumers on their rights when shopping in other EU countries, as well as Iceland and Norway. They can help consumers understand their rights under EU law, and can provide advice on how to resolve disputes with traders in other countries.
Assistance with complaints: The ECC can assist consumers with complaints against traders in other EU countries, as well as Iceland and Norway. They can provide guidance on the complaint process, and can help consumers to contact the relevant authorities or alternative dispute resolution bodies.
Mediation and conciliation: The ECC can act as a mediator or conciliator in disputes between consumers and traders in other EU countries, as well as Iceland and Norway. This can help to resolve disputes quickly and amicably, without the need for legal action.
Coordination with other authorities: The ECC works closely with national and European consumer protection authorities, as well as with other organizations such as the European Commission and the European Parliament, to promote consumer protection and improve cooperation between member states.
Overall, the ECC provides a valuable service to consumers by helping them to understand their rights and providing assistance with cross-border disputes. Their services are free of charge and available to all EU citizens.
|
|
|
Getting my divorce finalized |
Posted by: Donesia - 02-23-2023, 08:36 PM - Forum: Past or Current cases
- No Replies
|
 |
Here is a previous case by *** (Identity withheld for privacy reasons).
I'm looking for an inexpensive lawyer that could help finalize my divorce from my husband. We already went through arbitration on Aug 11, 2022, and I thought that after mediation, our divorce would have been finalized right away. We were told that the agreement was not binding until it was reviewed by the attorney. My husband was supposed to be paying the lawyer, but he has not done so. He has failed to pay the fee of $200, and the lawyer is no longer pushing the case. We got married on 10/24/13 and have been separated for six years now. We shared two girls, ages 6 & 10 years. We have no business or properties together. We had some debts which were paid off by me because he was not willing to pay. We share nothing apart from our children. An arrangement was made for my husband to take the children on the weekends. He has also said the specific reason for not paying the lawyer is to avoid paying child support since he was not divorced, and could come and go as he pleases. I thought the process would have been quicker, but I'm waiting for the case to be reviewed and riding it out.
|
|
|
Goldman Sacks and Evolution MD |
Posted by: kishana.n - 02-23-2023, 03:57 PM - Forum: Past or Current cases
- No Replies
|
 |
Here is a previous case by *** (Identity withheld for privacy reasons).
I have two other cases I need arbitration. Goldman Sacks excessive charge post on my accounts for the past 3 years, bank statements doesn’t match the Apple Card transaction reports. The overcharged are for 14954.66$ maybe more than was only for 21-22. I have apple credit card I bought devices with installment they have been charged two times.
1) All devices have been paid off at this amount never been deducted from the total balance.
2) December 22 reversal claim 12/09/20, as show on the Apple Card transaction report you never credited. In the first place, that is a fraud!
3) Excessive charged have been post on my account regularly since the Apple Card transaction does not match the bank statements
The second is negligence for the clinic Evolution MD I did the plastic surgery in 2022 I had post op complications lost income pain suffering my health is becoming worst since I did the surgery, one month ago the clinic was willing to refund me in full. I have all medical records supporting my claim.
|
|
|
Help with my late son's Social Security |
Posted by: kishana.n - 02-22-2023, 10:52 PM - Forum: Past or Current cases
- No Replies
|
 |
Here is a previous case by *** (Identity withheld for privacy reasons).
I am calling regarding my late son IA's social security. My son wasn't living with me, AC was taking care of him in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. She worked with him and lived with him, and she killed my son. I received two Social security billing statement letters today from Mid-Atlantic Program Service Center, 300 Spring Garden St, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. One is saying that the total amount due is $24,167.30 which says it was paid, but I don't know who paid off that one as the other letter I received is saying that the total amount due is $8,896.
I already took my name off his Social Security information and they were sending the cheques to AC. They were still taking the money even though he was dead and they want me to pay it, and I receive a low income. I am not sure of their address or if they moved as my other son took me away 1-2 years now and moved from Philadelphia to Florida. I will try to get the address to give to the team. I don't know what is going on and I would like someone to help me.
|
|
|
|